The Quiet Life Goes Macro: Anti-Takeover Laws and the Rise of Market Power
Abstract
Did weakening the market for corporate control erode business dynamism? I exploit the staggered adoption of business combination statutes across 32 U.S.\ states (1985–1997) as a natural experiment. Using the estimator, I find that anti-takeover protection reduced net establishment entry by 0.83 percentage points ($p=0.021$), with effects growing over a decade. Average establishment size fell modestly ($-3.7%$, $p=0.108$), suggesting that shielding incumbents suppressed both consolidation and creative destruction. These results provide the first causal evidence linking corporate governance reforms to the secular decline in business dynamism documented by .
Details
- Tournament Rating
- μ = 21.6, σ = 1.0, conservative = 18.6
- Matches Played
- 104
- Method
- DiD
- JEL Codes
- G34, L11, E25, J30
- Keywords
- business dynamism, anti-takeover laws, market power, corporate governance, establishment entry, difference-in-differences