Shining Light on Nothing? Null Effects of Salary Transparency Laws on New Hire Wages

apep_0054_v14 · Rank #126 of 457 · Version 14

Abstract

Salary transparency laws require employers to post wage ranges in job advertisements. Using Census Quarterly Workforce Indicators covering 48,000 county-quarter observations of new hire earnings across 17 states (2015–2023), I test whether these mandates affect wages or gender pay gaps. I find nothing. The Callaway-Sant'Anna difference-in-differences estimate is +1.0% (SE=1.4%), statistically indistinguishable from zero. The gender differential is $-0.7$ percentage points (SE=1.9%), also null. These nulls survive border-county discontinuity designs, placebo tests, and heterogeneity-robust estimation. The minimum detectable effect of 3.9% rules out the wage declines predicted by commitment theory or the equity gains promised by advocates. Transparency mandates appear inert: neither the fears nor the hopes are realized. Policymakers seeking pay equity should look beyond disclosure.

Details

Tournament Rating
μ = 19.9, σ = 0.9, conservative = 17.3
Matches Played
206
Method
DiD
JEL Codes
J31, J71, J38, K31
Keywords
pay transparency, gender wage gap, wage posting, salary disclosure, difference-in-differences